PubMed-compiled information sheet
This sheet was compiled from PubMed (NIH) abstracts using AI assistance. Every factual claim is cited to a real PubMed article (see the source list). It has not yet been human-reviewed — confirm with a healthcare provider before use.
Compiled from 30 PubMed articles · model: gemma4:31b
Summary
Background
Traditional uses
Active compounds
Mechanism of action
Clinical evidence
A single-arm, open-label trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of 1050 mg/day of encapsulated Tabebuia avellanedae in women aged 18-45 [PMID:36960315].
While claimed as a 'miraculous' cure, there is no scientific evidence that nutritional regimens including pau d'arco tea are appropriate as primary cancer treatment [PMID:8364770]. Beta-lapachone is currently in phase II clinical trials for pancreatic cancer [PMID:33667813].
A case report described the amelioration of GEKA in a patient with terminal kidney disease using lapacho tea wraps [PMID:33620676].
Safety & adverse effects
Evidence summary
PubMed sources
- 1.PMID: 36960315 (2022) — Safety and tolerability of Pau d' Arco (Tabebuia avellanedae) for primary dysmenorrhea: A single-arm, open-label trial on adults ages 18-45. · Advances in integrative medicine
- 2.PMID: 33667813 (2021) — Beta-lapachone: Natural occurrence, physicochemical properties, biological activities, toxicity and synthesis. · Phytochemistry
- 3.PMID: 24646717 (2014) — Pau d'arco activates Nrf2-dependent gene expression via the MEK/ERK-pathway. · The Journal of toxicological sciences
- 4.PMID: 37548308 (2024) — Effects of Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart. ex DC.) Mattos extract on inflammatory, immune, atherogenic profile and differentiation in THP-1 cell line. · Natural product research
- 5.PMID: 32875965